AI pilots stall before production at a predictable rate. The technology works. The architecture doesn't. Specifically, the design for where the AI runs and where the deterministic process takes over.
That line separates a governed deployment from a compliance event.
This session gives you a framework to draw it. You'll learn to map your processes across a stakes-vs-complexity quadrant, identify which of five automation types fits each scenario, and assess which of four agent autonomy levels your regulated environment can actually support.
We close with a live demonstration of IBM BAW and watsonx Orchestrate on a governed invoice-to-pay workflow.
You'll leave with:
A seven-dimension decision framework that matches workflow scenarios to the right automation type: deterministic workflow, decision automation, document AI, RAG assistants, or AI agents
A method to locate your processes on the stakes-vs-complexity quadrant and determine the correct automation posture
Criteria for evaluating agent autonomy levels against your compliance and operational risk thresholds
Human-in-the-loop and audit logging patterns that hold up under regulatory scrutiny
KPIs tied to cycle time, unit cost, capacity, quality, and control strength
The Agentify Readiness Assessment to determine whether your initiative has what it needs to move from pilot to production
Originally posted on 2026-05-19 in the IRPA AI Network — Enterprise AI